I’m having a hard time understanding why the settlement agreement was rejected. Sounds like Pegasus was willing to assist with costs to move a pond to make it work. Sounds like they could still build there apartments and not be in line with the runway. Sounds like it could have ended the trial and stopped more and more cost to the city tax payers. Why would that he rejected? What am I not understanding that could make that a bad deal???
I’m having a hard time understanding why the settlement agreement was rejected. Sounds like Pegasus was willing to assist with costs to move a pond to make it work. Sounds like they could still build there apartments and not be in line with the runway. Sounds like it could have ended the trial and stopped more and more cost to the city tax payers. Why would that he rejected? What am I not understanding that could make that a bad deal???